Does mandating health care violate constitution dating servicesin pa
At any rate, these are serious questions, worthy of serious consideration by Members of Congress.Members of Congress should not merely blow them off as irrelevant, as Speaker Pelosi has infamously done.The health care reform debate raises many complex issues including those of coverage, accessibility, cost, accountability, and quality of health care.Underlying these policy considerations are issues regarding the status of health care as a constitutional or legal right.
Although most Supreme Court justices probably do not consciously consider the popularity of a challenged law, history suggests that such factors have a subconscious effect.
In another case similarly relied on, the Court extended the Commerce Power to people who grew, exchanged, and used medical marijuana.
But, again, in that case those regulated were actually engaged in activities that could be regulated.
Obamacare doesn't violate the religious freedom of employers that don't want to cover contraceptives, a federal judge in Missouri has ruled. District Judge Carol Jackson ruled on Friday that this Obamacare provision indeed is constitutional.
Frank O'Brien, the owner of O'Brien Industrial Holdings, filed a lawsuit in March claiming that Obamacare violated his religious freedom by mandating that his company's health insurance cover employees' contraceptive use, according to Courthouse News Service. "This Court rejects the proposition that requiring indirect financial support of a practice, from which plaintiff himself abstains according to his religious principles, constitutes a substantial burden on plaintiff's religious exercise," Jackson wrote in the decision.